Armenia holds steady in its pro-European course

Euranet Plus Panorama is a weekly news review that showcases our network’s wide-ranging coverage of EU-related stories.

Adaugă ca sursă preferată în Google

Radio România Internațional, 15.06.2026, 17:44

Armenia holds steady in its pro-European course

Armenians went to the polls last Sunday, appearing to thumb their noses at Moscow’s threats, intimidation and hybrid-warfare tactics by re-electing their pro-European prime minister for a third time.

Nikol Pashinyan and his Civil Contract party have been in power since leading the pro-democracy Velvet Revolution in 2018.

Russia up to its old tricks

Over the last eight years, Pashinyan has steered Armenia on a path of modernisation and democratisation, as well as pushing strongly for peaceful coexistence with the country’s historical enemy, Azerbaijan. He has gradually pulled further away from Russia and pursued more pronounced pro-Western policies, in particular deepening Yerevan’s partnership with the EU.

There were serious fears ahead of these elections that the Moscow-led influence operations that had taken place in Moldova prior to the elections there last autumn would play out in Armenia too. Money was poured into the campaigns of the three pro-Russian opposition candidates and disinformation was certainly rife, much of it targeted very precisely at Prime Minister Pashinyan himself.

In an interview with RTBF, Laetitia Spetschinsky, a specialist on Euro-Russian relations who lectures at Belgium’s UCLouvain, says that the pressure on the Armenian leader was virtually unprecedented.

Laetitia Spetschinsky, Expert on Euro-Russian relations (in French):

“We are seeing a range of methods being deployed covertly through operations involving not only disinformation, but what might be described as cyber-distortion of reality – in particular through the manoeuvres of the cells known as Storm-1516, which produce fake or deepfake content featuring false videos of Pashinyan. He is portrayed as a traitor to the nation, particularly in this fake video, for example, in which he downplays the Armenian Genocide – something that could obviously put him completely at odds with his own people.”

In addition, in the run-up to the election, Russian president Vladimir Putin openly stated, in a not-particularly-veiled threat, that Armenia was heading down the same path as Ukraine. He was clearly not only alluding to Ukraine’s European ambitions… but also to what came next.

Laetitia Spetschinsky, Expert on Euro-Russian relations (in French):

“This is a blatant threat to national security. They have also referred to import embargoes and restrictions on the movement of goods and people, which would cost Armenia around four billion dollars a year, given the close economic ties between Russia and Armenia. In short, we are seeing the full range of economic and existential threats being voiced in public by Russian political leaders.”

But despite this hybrid assault, and significant citizen disengagement, pro-European voters in Armenia came out in force. At nearly 60 per cent, turnout was much higher than in previous elections.

So how is Pashinyan convincing voters? Kuku Raadio puts this question to Piruza Harutyunyan, Armenia’s honorary consul in Estonia.

Piruza Harutyunyan, Armenian Honorary Consul in Estonia (in Estonian):

“His promise is that Armenia, a landlocked country, will become a regional crossroads that creates many opportunities and much more balance than Armenia has ever had before… and, as such, a better life for the people of Armenia. He also confirmed that he will continue with democratic reforms and wants to bring Armenia into line with European standards and regulations.”

New map, new future

One key polarising issue in Armenia was touched on in passing by Laetitia Spetschinsky: the ceding of territory to the Azerbaijanis. She was referring to the concessions the Pashinyan government has made to Azerbaijan in peace negotiations aimed at resolving the more than 30-year conflict over Nagorno‑Karabakh, a mountainous region inhabited by ethnic Armenians but recognised under international law as belonging to Azerbaijan. PM Pashinyan has taken the pragmatic, but politically risky, decision to recognise Azerbaijani sovereignty over this region.

A trilateral ceasefire agreement signed in November 2020 by Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia brought a six-week war over the contested region to an end. The agreement involved territorial concessions on the part of Armenia, the unblocking of economic and transport links by Azerbaijan, and the deployment of a Russian peacekeeping contingent to secure transit.

However, it ultimately collapsed for a range of reasons: periodic military escalations; the failure of Russian peacekeepers to maintain a security buffer; a devastating ten-month Azerbaijani blockade of the region, which cut its ethic Armenian population off from Armenia – not to mention food and medical supplies; and a military offensive by Azerbaijan in 2023 that ultimately resulted in the mass exodus of the region’s ethnic Armenians.

Nicolae Țibrigan is a research fellow at the Romanian Academy’s Institute of Political Science and International Relations. He tells Radio România that the collapse of this agreement was another factor in Pashinyan’s latest victory.

Nicolae Țibrigan, Research Fellow at the Romanian Academy (in Romanian):

“For many Armenians, Russia’s failure to protect Armenia in accordance with the treaty signed in 2020 has eroded the credibility of the Kremlin’s main message: that Russia is the sole guarantor of Armenia’s security. This is no longer the case, and this vote has demonstrated once again that Armenia is seeking to secure its own territory, with support from the West as well.”

At a Trump-led summit in Washington in August 2025, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan finally got behind a draft peace treaty. Indeed, peace dividends have now started to be felt in both countries – dividends including the beginning of bilateral trade… and the fact that 2025 was the first year since Armenia’s independence in 1991 that there were no casualties at this border.

Yet challenges remain for Pashinyan, who has held on to a parliamentary majority, but failed to secure the supermajority needed to amend the constitution to remove implied territorial claims to the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Without this step, a definitive peace agreement with Azerbaijan is impossible, explains Piruza Harutyunyan, Armenia’s honorary consul in Estonia.